1. The first origins attributed to purely economic
imperialism. The need for raw materials for European industry, markets to sell
the manufactures of the metropolis and investment sectors for capital surpluses
were, according to this hypothesis, the main reasons for the expansion. To this
economic protectionism, which had been imposed in many countries as a result of
depression of the 70s and had reduced the available markets it is added.
2. The second explanation considers imperialism as a result
of the growing European nationalism. Colonies were considered symbols of
prestige against other nations, and served to feed power in the country.
3. The third explanation sees the division of the world that
came from the '80s was a continuation of the expansionary trend of the first
part of the century. The European exercised control over some areas needed
reinforced through annexations, because of the crisis generated in the regions
subjected product from foreign domination.
4. The fourth explanation considers the systematic
occupation and the sharing of certain regions of the sharp demand for colonies,
initiated by Otto von Bismarck and continued by Guillermo II were due, since
Germany had come to the colonial race delayed with respect to France and
England. German Chancellor regarded the colonies as a useful tool for trading
in European conflicts. The enormous demands placed on colonial matters spurred
other countries to launch into a frantic race to occupy territories, earning
hand to the other powers.
5. The fifth explaniation its that Europe was the continet with more strong countries, so thats way they had most of the colonies and also because that give power, better economy and natural resources .
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario